goestoeleven:

Really getting tired of this one.
There are logical points you can make to advance your argument. This one couldn’t be less logical if you tried.

Hi, I’m your average CCW Holder.
I own firearms, I even carry a few of them. Guess what? I’m a very capable shot, well beyond the level of local law enforcement as I’ve taken several of those guys to school at the range. Of course, Southern Local Law Enforcement tend to be better shots as a lot of those boys are gun enthusiasts too but I digress. I can probably shoot on par with the secret service when it comes to pistols. [I really should join competitions but hey, lack of money kinda stunts that idea.] 


It’s not a stupid argument, it’s a comparison that many people are missing. Why is he allowed to protect his family with armed men when he’s hinted numerous times he doesn’t want us to be armed to protect our own. It’s done in a lot of very poor thought out ways, but at its simplest form, the argument is there. It’s even more ironic when you think about the fact that his unchecked usage of drones have killed over 600 civilians to 3,000 “terrorists” in Yemen and Pakistan, a lot of those civilians being children, including an American Civilian who was just sixteen years of age.

I’m sorry, who needs what regulated again? What were you saying that seemed stupid?

goestoeleven:

Really getting tired of this one.

There are logical points you can make to advance your argument. This one couldn’t be less logical if you tried.

Hi, I’m your average CCW Holder.

I own firearms, I even carry a few of them. Guess what? I’m a very capable shot, well beyond the level of local law enforcement as I’ve taken several of those guys to school at the range. Of course, Southern Local Law Enforcement tend to be better shots as a lot of those boys are gun enthusiasts too but I digress. I can probably shoot on par with the secret service when it comes to pistols. [I really should join competitions but hey, lack of money kinda stunts that idea.] 

It’s not a stupid argument, it’s a comparison that many people are missing. Why is he allowed to protect his family with armed men when he’s hinted numerous times he doesn’t want us to be armed to protect our own. It’s done in a lot of very poor thought out ways, but at its simplest form, the argument is there. It’s even more ironic when you think about the fact that his unchecked usage of drones have killed over 600 civilians to 3,000 “terrorists” in Yemen and Pakistan, a lot of those civilians being children, including an American Civilian who was just sixteen years of age.

I’m sorry, who needs what regulated again? What were you saying that seemed stupid?

  1. kansasxinxblood reblogged this from rifleisfine
  2. thunderdolt reblogged this from goestoeleven and added:
    One thing the CCW person is missing is that marksmanship is not a factor when hiring officers of the law. Discharging a...
  3. simonavalle reblogged this from rifleisfine
  4. ohwasteland reblogged this from rifleisfine and added:
    I would love to see that study. There are people I know who need to be shown it.
  5. lafix reblogged this from goestoeleven and added:
    No kidding. Like the Secret Service didn’t have to have their backgrounds checked. Like he could waive Secret Service...
  6. rifleisfine reblogged this from tacticalhoneybadger and added:
    I’ll provide sources if needed later (on my phone currently) but there was a study a few years back that showed that...
  7. elizabite said: Oh my god, so am I.
  8. kristynibbles said: ughhhhhhhh
  9. goestoeleven reblogged this from tacticalhoneybadger and added:
    I do not know how often these skills are tested, but the baseline training in both marksmanship and situational response...
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/Zn1gxvc2aOUf